Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Anthropological Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hage, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A not so multi-sited ethnography of a not so imagined community

Ghassan Hage

Department of Anthropology, University of Sydney, Australia, ghassan.hage{at}arts.usyd.edu.au

This article reflects on key analytical concepts used in the anthropology of migration in the light of the author’s own ethnographic work on Lebanese migrants in a number of international locations. It first examines the notion of multi-sited ethnography and argues that in the study of migrants sharing a unifying culture across a number of global locations, multi-sitedness is less helpful than a notion of a single geographically discontinuous site. The article also examines the excessive usage of the notion of ‘imagined community’ in diasporic research. It argues that there is often very little empirical evidence of ‘community’ presented in the literature that uses the concept. Finally, the article examines the uncritical assumption often made that the study of migration is the study of ‘mobility’. It argues that migrants do not really spend that much time ‘moving’ in the sense assumed by the notion of ‘mobility’.

Key Words: Lebanese diaspora • migration • mobility • multi-sited ethnography • transnational community

Anthropological Theory, Vol. 5, No. 4, 463-475 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1463499605059232


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anthropological TheoryHome page
G. Hage
Hating Israel in the Field: On ethnography and political emotions
Anthropological Theory, March 1, 2009; 9(1): 59 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
E. Colson
Linkages Methodology: No Man is an Island
Journal of Refugee Studies, June 1, 2007; 20(2): 320 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]