This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Knauft, B. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Anthropology in the middle

Emory University, USA

During the last decade and a half, anthropologists have increasingly given up grand theoretical debates to pursue mid-level articulations that effectively cross many of the discipline’s received divides and oppositions. In the process, a middle ground of increasing connections cross-cuts and cross-fertilizes academic theory and applied practice, regional and local scales of analysis, world areas, general structures and specific events, ethnography and history, and objectivism vis-à-vis reflexive or experimental genres of representation and analysis. Amid continuing challenges of anthropological method and representation, these post-paradigmatic articulations have opened sociocultural anthropology to important new ranges of perspective, topical fields, and critical interventions.

Key Words: anthropological theory • applied anthropology • history of anthropology • meso-anthropology • practice anthropology • practice theory

Anthropological Theory, Vol. 6, No. 4, 407-430 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1463499606071594


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. P. Brereton Why sociocultural anthropology needs John Dewey's evolutionary model of experience Anthropological Theory, March 1, 2009; 9(1): 5 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]