Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Anthropological Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kearney, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Classifying and Value-Filtering Missions of Borders

Michael Kearney

University of California, Riverside, USA michael.kearney{at}ucr.edu

Using examples of migration of Mixtecs from Oaxaca and of Mexican nationals in general across the US–Mexican border, this article explores and illustrates the proposition that the political importance of social borders varies directly with the degree to which they serve two basic missions. The first of these missions is classificatory in the sense of defining, categorizing, and otherwise affecting the identities that are circumscribed and divided by borders and that cross them. Such kinds of identities are ethnicity, nationality, the cultural experience, markers of social class and so on. The second mission is also classificatory, but in the sense of affecting the economic CLASS positions and relationships of migrants who cross borders. This second mission of borders is effected by differentially filtering and transforming forms of economic value that flow across them and between identities defined by them. It is argued that these two complementary processes – classification of identities and CLASSification (uneven value exchange) – are the primary de facto missions of significant borders.

Key Words: borders • class • identity • migration • Mixtec • value

Anthropological Theory, Vol. 4, No. 2, 131-156 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1463499604042811


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anthropological TheoryHome page
J. McC. Heyman and H. Campbell
The anthropology of global flows: A critical reading of Appadurai's `Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy'
Anthropological Theory, June 1, 2009; 9(2): 131 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
C. M. Getrich
Negotiating Boundaries of Social Belonging: Second-Generation Mexican Youth and the Immigrant Rights Protests of 2006
American Behavioral Scientist, December 1, 2008; 52(4): 533 - 556.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Latin American PerspectivesHome page
C. Howe, S. Zaraysky, and L. Lorentzen
Transgender Sex Workers and Sexual Transmigration between Guadalajara and San Francisco
Latin American Perspectives, January 1, 2008; 35(1): 31 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]